I'm not going to lie and say I spend all my spare time reading
seattletimes.com or the
Poynter Institute's Web site. I read celebrity gossip sites, which I think is a good way to keep up on pop-culture events and trends (and it definitely can come in handy at work when the baby boomers start asking who Jay-Z is).
And furthermore, I've always had an interest in celebrity news, and, OK, if I'm being honest, the gossip side is somewhat appealing. (See Google Talk status reading: "It's just a little harmless lime-swapping ... right?!) After all, it's not like being a copy editor is particularly salacious.
I mainly read Celebrity Baby Blog, because it's fun to see all the trendy baby gear, and hey, it's always interesting to hear what celebs name their kids (seriously Gwen and Gavin --
Zuma?), and I also like Crazy Days & Nights, which has blind items that are fun to guess (even if I'm rarely correct). Considering the subject matter, I generally make a point of not taking what I read too seriously. (But I never made any such promises about rolling my eyes.)
But there's always an exception.
Earlier today I read in the San Jose Mercury-News that Teri
Hatcher's molester (her former uncle by marriage) had died in prison.
She is the one who, reputation be damned, came forward in 2002 and put him away. He had molested three young girls. One of those girls went on to become an award-winning actress with a lot of emotional baggage. One of those girls put a gun to her head, clutched a photo of her grandmother to her chest, and pulled the trigger.
I have to admit I wasn't too surprised when I heard about what had happened to Teri when her Vanity Fair interview was published in 2006. It definitely explained some things. Her relationship with her parents always had me thinking that if something
had happened, it had been her father who had abused her. Turns out that they just turned a blind eye to it. And I really haven't ever commented on it -- on the boards, at least -- because what could I say, other than that I have the utmost respect for her for coming forward?
But what got my attention tonight was when I clicked on a link on a Google news alert and it took me to Perez Hilton's Web site.
I think Perez Hilton is a total
douchebag. Always have. But I also know that instead of being bothered by the backlash, he thrives on being a controversial prick. Even so, I thought it was pretty reprehensible to publish a post about Teri's "alleged" molester having died, thus casting doubt on her story. Even better were the reader comments saying that she deserved it, that she is responsible for that girl's death, that she
wanted it to happen ... talk about sick.
Like I said, I generally read the mainstream blogs. I didn't even know some of the more tasteless ones existed until I had to deal with the
cyberstalker who was posting fake comments as me about Teri and Dean. (And you bet your sweet
chumpy I posted a comment on the Perez thread. For the record, I'm not some vigilante for her -- or any other celebrity -- but I just couldn't help myself. I think the phrase "attention whore" came up -- and I wasn't talking about Teri.)
Yes, celebrities
voluntarily put themselves in the spotlight, whether it's by starring in a movie, or swimming to eight Olympic golds. But it's kind of sickening when judgement starts being passed for things over which they had no control. I can't even imagine being judged over my miscarriage. And the thing is, if I was a celebrity, I'm sure I would have been.
And unfortunately, with the popularity of blogs and other forms of non-conventional media (defined as everything from shows like "The Soup" to the endless array of "news" magazines to people like Perez Hilton being interviewed about their take on current events), the line starts to blur between legit journalism and this crap.
And contrary to public perception, those of us who work for legitimate news outlets, and write such headlines as "Oil prices fall for second straight day," do not set out to write "OH MY GOD" headlines. I have a feeling that a lot of true-blue newsmen and women cringe. I know that I do. And we know better than to throw words like "alleged" around unless we have a damn good reason.
Fifteen-second journalism lesson: You can call someone an alleged molester until they have been convicted. Once the facts have been proven, the word is no longer necessary. Case in point, you don't see people going around calling Ted Bundy an alleged killer.
Perhaps some of these "media" members should have taken News Writing (and, really, Media Law, too) before they started professing to be journalistic experts. But no, they prefer to gain "experience" by speculating if so-and-so is pregnant again, or if so-and-so is cheating on his wife.
As someone who works in the mainstream media, it's kind of disheartening that people can't get enough of this garbage -- and at the same time, newspaper readership continues to decline. To borrow one of my favorite L&C quotes (from SLV in Season 4), those type of salacious publications are "only after sleaze --you're a disgrace to legitimate reporters."
All that sleaze kind of makes me want to go take a shower.